<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<component xmlns="https://zibelinepub.com" version="1.0.2" type="journal" xml:lang="en">
<header>
<publicationMeta level="journal">
			<publisherInfo>
				<publisherName>Zibeline International Publishing</publisherName>
				<publisherLoc>Acta Scientifica Malaysia</publisherLoc>
			</publisherInfo>
			
			<doi origin="razipublishing" registered="yes">10.26480/asm.01.2025.45.51</doi>
			
			<issn type="online">2521-5051</issn>
			<issn type="print">2521-506X</issn>
			
			<titleGroup>
				<title type="subject" xml:lang="en" sort="Acta Scientifica Malaysia">Acta Scientifica Malaysia</title>
				<title type="title">SWITCHING FROM CONVENTIONAL UREA TO LIQUID NANO-UREA FEEDING FOR SUSTAINING RICE CULTIVATION</title>
			</titleGroup>
			
			<copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2017 Zibeline International Publishing</copyright>
			
			<eventGroup>
				<event type="publication_date" date="06-10-2025"/>
			</eventGroup>
		
			<creators>
				<creator xml:id="MFA" creatorRole="editor">
					<personName>
						<editorNames>Md. Parvez Anwar</editorNames>
					</personName>
				</creator>
                <creator xml:id="MSHS" creatorRole="editor">
					<personName>
						<editorNames>Md. Sazzad Hossain Shemul</editorNames>
					</personName>
				</creator>
                <creator xml:id="AM" creatorRole="editor">
					<personName>
						<editorNames>Anjon Mallick</editorNames>
					</personName>
				</creator>
                <creator xml:id="MTR" creatorRole="editor">
					<personName>
						<editorNames>Md. Taibur Rahman</editorNames>
					</personName>
				</creator>
                <creator xml:id="AKH" creatorRole="editor">
					<personName>
						<editorNames>Ahmed Khairul Hasan</editorNames>
					</personName>
				</creator>
                <creator xml:id="SY" creatorRole="editor">
					<personName>
						<editorNames>Sabina Yeasmin</editorNames>
					</personName>
				</creator>
                <creator xml:id="AMI" creatorRole="editor">
					<personName>
						<editorNames>A K M Mominul Islam</editorNames>
					</personName>
				</creator>   
			</creators>
			
</publicationMeta>

		<citation_keywords>
		    <keyword>Prilled urea, Nano-nitrogen, Nitrogen use efficiency, Productivity, Cost effectiveness, Paddy</keyword>
		</citation_keywords>
			
		<citation_pdfformat>
		     <pdf_url>https://zibelinepub.com/archives/1asm2025/1asm2025-45-51.pdf</pdf_url>
	    </citation_pdfformat>
	   
	   <citation_XMLformat>
	         <xml_url>https://zibelinepub.com/xml/1asm2025/1asm2025-45-51.xml</xml_url>
	   </citation_XMLformat>
	   
	   <citation_volume>
	       <volume>9</volume>
	   </citation_volume>
	   
	   <citation_issue>
	        <issue>1</issue>
	   </citation_issue>
	   
	   <citation_pages>
	      <pages>45-51</pages>
	   </citation_pages>  
	   
	   <citation_fulltext_html>
	       <fulltext_html>https://actascientificamalaysia.com/asm-01-2025-45-51/</fulltext_html>
	    </citation_fulltext_html>
		
<abstractGroup>

			<abstract type="main" xml:lang="en">
			<title type="main">Summary</title>
			
				<p>Prilled urea is mostly used as a nitrogen source having low efficiency (~35%) causing serious environmental concerns like eutrophication, greenhouse gas emissions and soil pollution and economic harm due to high production cost. Considering these issues, a study was carried out to investigate into the effect of integrated application liquid nano-urea fertilizer with conventional prilled urea on the productivity and profitability of monsoon rice. The experiment was a single factor comprising 13 different combinations of prilled urea and liquid nano-urea fertilizer treatments arranged in a randomized complete block design with three replications. The maximum number of total tillers hill-1 (20.03), effective tillers hill-1 (16.50) and grains panicle-1 (116.33) were observed from the application of recommended prilled urea + 0.5 % nano-urea combination. The highest grain yield (4.28 t ha-1) and straw yield (5.20 t ha-1) were found from the application of 75 % recommended prilled urea + 0.5 % nano-urea combination which provided maximum net return (62,959 BDT ha-1) and gross return (1,91,400 BDT ha-1). In contrast, the minimum gross return (1,39,180 BDT ha-1) was demonstrated from applying 50 % recommended prilled urea + 0.2 % nano-urea combination. Based on the findings, it may be concluded that applying 0.2–0.5% nano-urea allows a 25% reduction in prilled urea without yield reduction. However, using only 50% prilled urea with nano-urea reduces yield. The most cost-effective option was 75% prilled urea with 0.5% nano-urea which will make this combination a promising strategy for sustainable rice production</p>
				
			</abstract>

</abstractGroup> 
			
			
			
</header>
	</component>
			